In the context of grand theft, which of the following items can be considered stolen?

In the context of grand theft, an item must typically have a certain value and be considered valuable in a legal sense. A fire extinguisher can be deemed valuable due to its purpose and necessity for safety; it is not only useful but also may have a monetary value attached to it, especially if it's functional equipment. Therefore, if a fire extinguisher is taken without permission, it qualifies as theft, as it represents a tangible asset that carries value and serves a critical safety function.

On the other hand, cash amounts under $300 would likely fall below the threshold for grand theft in most jurisdictions, thus disqualifying it from being considered for this offense. An empty pizza box would have negligible value and does not represent property that can be classified under grand theft, as it lacks inherent worth. Similarly, old furniture may not always meet the criteria for grand theft unless it holds significant value; unless deemed valuable or unique, it might not qualify under the same legal definitions as more essential items. Therefore, the fire extinguisher stands out as a valid example of what can be considered stolen in the context of grand theft.